| Customization / Icons / OS Icons / Mac OS | ©2010-2012 ~Kiwiiik |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |


I like the style and simplicity of the icons, just try to focus more on their consistency.Good Luck
--
Twitter.Forrst
For this - good nice first try, keep practicing, but I wouldn't pay, nor use in any software for free…
And also, why make 48x48? we go resolution-independent, yet every time still i see 32x32px or 48x48px icons….
Is this meant for Windows 2000? Or XP?!
Make it scaleable at least.
And pixel perfection doesn't necessarily mean each pixel has been drawn individually, it just means that each pixel has been carefully thought and is not here by chance.
Also, scalability in icon design is not that useful, actually. Only a very few styles can handle scalability, for the remaining ones - most of the styles - scalability is of no use. Because the icon would lack of details - details that hadn't been done in smaller sizes for the icon would have looked unclear - some strokes and lines would be too thick, etc...
--
Harno Ranaivo - Harenome Ranaivoarivony Razanajato
Founder of the #linux-users group.
I can speak English, French, a few German and a very few Chinese.
--
If you have Forrst account, visit at my profile
--
[link] <<add me!>>
--
Follow me on Twitter: @Clubb3rry
--
Stop being default! Customize your Mac, iPad or iPhone with [link] (iconpaper)
"There is always free cheese in a mousetrap"
--
www.dembsky.pl & www.dembsky.me
--
(dw) danwiersema.com