deviant art





Login
Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour Lost Password?
Deviant Login
Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]

More from ~Kiwiiik

Featured in Groups:

Details

September 19, 2010
58.1 KB
600×390
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 10
Favourites: 31 [who?]
Views: 4,196 (1 today)
[x]
:iconkiwiiik:
I would love feedback :)
:icon:
Add a Comment:
 
:iconkyo-tux:
these icons look simple and clean :) I'd suggest one thing though, most of the objects appear to be standing straight but address-book,facebook,picture and calender seem to be falling behind.The view of the pin is totally different from other icons too.

I like the style and simplicity of the icons, just try to focus more on their consistency.Good Luck ;)

--
Twitter.Forrst
Reply
:iconanewbignoise:
You guys are talented, all of those who create icons, but if you look at stockicons.com, fasticons.com, yellowicons.com, or kombine, or glyphish, or pixelpress, that's where you go and look up stock icons that are worth paying for.

For this - good nice first try, keep practicing, but I wouldn't pay, nor use in any software for free…
And also, why make 48x48? we go resolution-independent, yet every time still i see 32x32px or 48x48px icons….
Is this meant for Windows 2000? Or XP?!
Make it scaleable at least.
Reply
Hidden by Owner
:iconkshegzyaj:
~Kshegzyaj Sep 20, 2010  Student Interface Designer
Pixel-perfect icons are very useful. A 32px icon designed to be displayed at 32px looks way better in a toolbar than a 512px icon downscaled at 32px. The only - most likely - icons that need to be designed at each size from 16px to 512px are applications icons. If they have a more restricted purpose (toolbar icons, panel icons...etc), only a few sizes are needed.
And pixel perfection doesn't necessarily mean each pixel has been drawn individually, it just means that each pixel has been carefully thought and is not here by chance.

Also, scalability in icon design is not that useful, actually. Only a very few styles can handle scalability, for the remaining ones - most of the styles - scalability is of no use. Because the icon would lack of details - details that hadn't been done in smaller sizes for the icon would have looked unclear - some strokes and lines would be too thick, etc...

--
Harno Ranaivo - Harenome Ranaivoarivony Razanajato
Founder of the #linux-users group.
I can speak English, French, a few German and a very few Chinese.
Reply
:iconkrisu0100:
Why 48px? Because those are made for (I think) website, not for desktop. Most of icons are made for webdesign in fact. Many webdesigners like 48px, because it's not too big and not too little.

--
If you have Forrst account, visit at my profile
Reply
:iconmillenniumbugstudios:
~millenniumbugstudios Sep 20, 2010  Professional General Artist
WOW!

--
[link] <<add me!>>
Reply
:iconclubberry:
~Clubberry Sep 20, 2010  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Beautiful, minimalism and clear icons! I think that they deserve attention ;)

--
Follow me on Twitter: @Clubb3rry
Reply
:iconsoundforge:
*SoundForge Sep 20, 2010   Interface Designer
Like Dan said...these icons are sharp, nice and clean. Very well done Nik!! :)

--
Stop being default! Customize your Mac, iPad or iPhone with [link] (iconpaper) :star:
"There is always free cheese in a mousetrap"
Reply
:icondembsky:
~dembsky Sep 20, 2010  Professional Interface Designer
I have to say that these icons are just perfect. Like =SmarTramS said "Nice and clean" :)

--
www.dembsky.pl & www.dembsky.me
Reply
:iconsmartrams:
Sharp! Nice and clean, really great work! :)

--
(dw) danwiersema.com
Reply
:icon:
Add a Comment: